Re: any policy for foo_new() return types?
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Stefan Rieken <StefanRieken SoftHome net>
- Cc: gtk-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: any policy for foo_new() return types?
- Date: 22 Nov 2000 11:48:14 -0500
Stefan Rieken <StefanRieken SoftHome net> writes:
> I have used GNOME and GTK+ for a long time, but only in the past few
> days I really got past the "Hello, World" stage. I couldn't help
> noticing that every foo_new() method had its own policy for what kind of
> struct to return. A few examples (sorry for using GNOME examples):
>
> - gnome_app_bar_new() returns a GtkWidget*
> (its far, but not "oldest" ancestor)
> - gnome_mdi_new() returns a GtkObject*
> (its "oldest", and only ancestor)
> - gnome_mdi_generic_child_new() returns a GnomeMDIGenericChild
> (an instance of itself)
> - gtk_adjustment_new() returns a GtkObject*
> (its "oldest", but not its only ancestor)
>
There is a policy, and it is:
- widgets are returned as GtkWidget*, the principle is that you are
most likely to need them as GtkWidget* (e.g. as the second arg
to gtk_container_add(), to show them, etc.)
- everything else should be returned as the most-derived type
gtk_adjustment_new() and gnome_mdi_new() are broken for historical
reasons, they should return a GtkAdjustment* and GnomeMDI*.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]