RE: [gtk-list] Re: [ Glib ] : Licensing term of Glib 1.2.7 : Lesser or not Lesser
- From: Huet Xavier <Xavier Huet infineon com>
- To: "'gtk-list redhat com'" <gtk-list redhat com>
- Cc: "'Derek Simkowiak'" <dereks kd-dev com>
- Subject: RE: [gtk-list] Re: [ Glib ] : Licensing term of Glib 1.2.7 : Lesser or not Lesser
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 20:36:34 +0100
No sorry, I WAS WRONG !!!
I just check and in the headers, they mentioned
Library GPL. But I wasn't use to all these licensing terms
so I check the www.gnu.org and as you all know Library GPL == Lesser GPL.
Sorry for that,
~Xavier
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Derek Simkowiak [mailto:dereks@kd-dev.com]
> Sent: 16 March 2000 20:15
> To: 'gtk-list@redhat.com'
> Subject: [gtk-list] Re: [ Glib ] : Licensing term of Glib
> 1.2.7 : Lesser
> or not Lesser
>
>
> > Is Glib v1.2.7 licensed uder GPL term or under Lesser GPL ?
> > In the header files (glib.h), it's mentionned a GPL term
> > but the COPYING file is about Lesser GPL.
>
> It had better be under LGPL or there's going to be some serious
> fallout.
>
> I assume that the headers are incorrecly documented(?), this
> should be corrected as soon as possible.
>
>
> --Derek
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe
> gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]