Qt on gtk wrapper

[Andy Tai <atai ece ucsd edu>]

I find the following message about a Qt-compatible wrapper on top of gtk.  
This may be of interest so I forward it here...


Forwarded message:
> From freeqt-owner@modeemi.cs.tut.fi Mon Jan  3 19:57 PST 2000
> Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 22:51:51 -0500 (EST)
> From: Brian Bruns <camber@umcc.ais.org>
> To: freeqt@modeemi.cs.tut.fi
> Subject: [freeqt] Intros and question
> Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10001032231150.9764-100000@umcc.ais.org>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Sender: owner-freeqt@modeemi.cs.tut.fi
> Precedence: bulk
> Reply-To: freeqt@modeemi.cs.tut.fi
> X-info: To unsubscribe send: 'unsubscribe freeqt [<your-email-address>]' to Majordodo@modeemi.cs.tut.fi
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Length: 1107
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> The list seems pretty dead, but I'll ask anyway in the hopes that someone
> is still working on this thing.
> 
> I had the apparently brain-damaged idea of writing a Qt compatible set of
> wrapper classes for gtk+, which I am calling QtK.  It runs the first 4
> tutorial examples currently, but not much else. I'm getting ready to see
> if I can't make it work for a small program (SybSQL - a sybase query tool)
> written in Qt.  So my question is this, I'd like to attempt to share code
> between Harmony and QtK where possible (or more to the point use your fine
> work on classes such as QString, QDir, and other non-visual classes and
> hopefully return any improvements I make back to the project).
> 
> Any ideas on how this might be accomplished without unnecessarily forking
> the code? I'm still using the qt moc compiler, but would be more than
> happy to switch over to using magna and any else that might be necessary.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Brian Bruns
> The FreeTDS Project (http://www.freetds.org)
> 
> P.S. I realize there is a whole host of reasons why this is a stupid idea,
>      but I'm doing it mainly for hack value.
> 
> 
>