Re: [gtk-list] GtkPacked question
- From: Damon Chaplin <damon helixcode com>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] GtkPacked question
- Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2000 00:50:35 +0000
Syd Logan wrote:
>
> I looked at the implementation but still think I should ask: what is the
> reason for having pad_x and i_pad_x as arguments to gtk_packer_add()? I notice
> in the implementation that size computations are done in part by adding these
> two together, why not have a single value?
pad_x is for padding added around the outside of the child widget.
i_pad_x is for padding added inside the child widget.
Damon
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]