Re: More off behaviour in a clist...

I found out how to re-create a SEGFAULT when removing the last row from a

Sort the clist.  Remove the last row.  Segfault...

To the developers list:   Note: I am not on the list...
I am using GTK+-1.2.8
Linux kernel 2.4.0-test4

here's a backtrace:
#0  draw_rows (clist=0x80a7e28, area=0xbfffe70c) at gtkclist.c:5957
#1  0x4005b021 in vadjustment_value_changed (adjustment=0x80a7d80, 
    data=0x80a7e28) at gtkclist.c:6211
#2  0x400aad67 in gtk_marshal_NONE__NONE (object=0x80a7d80, 
    func=0x4005ade0 <vadjustment_value_changed>, func_data=0x80a7e28, 
    args=0xbfffe82c) at gtkmarshal.c:312
#3  0x400daae8 in gtk_handlers_run (handlers=0x80a09b0, signal=0xbfffe7d8, 
    object=0x80a7d80, params=0xbfffe82c, after=0) at gtksignal.c:1917
#4  0x400d9eff in gtk_signal_real_emit (object=0x80a7d80, signal_id=64, 
    params=0xbfffe82c) at gtksignal.c:1477
#5  0x400d825a in gtk_signal_emit_by_name (object=0x80a7d80, 
    name=0x4011c747 "value_changed") at gtksignal.c:618
#6  0x4005a922 in adjust_adjustments (clist=0x80a7e28, block_resize=0)
    at gtkclist.c:6074
#7  0x40052e2f in real_remove_row (clist=0x80a7e28, row=0) at
#8  0x400528a8 in gtk_clist_remove (clist=0x80a7e28, row=0) at
#9  0x80532e6 in add_remtrack_button_clicked (button=0x80a1d80,
user_data=0x0) at callbacks.c:252



Leeman Strout

Systems Engineer
ETC Support

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]