Re: gtk_signal_connect vs. connect_object?

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Antonio Campos <acampos@ceronet.com> writes: 
> All "those" just means the legacy/useless gtk_signal_connect_object(),
> not the
> gtk_signal_connect, of course...
> I think I have been misunderstood.
> 

The function isn't legacy/useless, it just has a stupid name for
legacy reasons. So at most it would be renamed. Probably Tim already
plans this in his GObject work.

Havoc