Re: [gtk-list] Re: OT: size_t and 64 bits
- From: Andy Kahn <ackahn netapp com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: OT: size_t and 64 bits
- Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 10:53:31 -0700
On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 09:55:29PM -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, John C Atkeson wrote:
> >
> > If I recompile my gtk code to 64-bit, does size_t become a 64-bit
> > integer?
> > I'm trying to use types that will scale as our systems advance.
> >
>
> If you use plain "int" and "unsigned int" (or gint and guint) they will be
> 64 bits on 64-bit platforms.
...
That's not the case on the Alpha. int's are 32 bits, long's are 64.
Check out the reasoning for the LP64 model over the other variants:
http://www.unix-systems.org/version2/whatsnew/lp64_wp.html
I believe that most other 64-bit systems follow this model as well
(e.g., AIX, Irix).
regards,
--andy
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]