Re: Threads and GTK+
- From: Matthew D Allen <s2mdalle titan vcu edu>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Threads and GTK+
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 20:11:53 -0500 (EST)
>This is a mea culpa, and a warning about the risks of answering email
>at 1am when you're already feeling dog tired.
>
>although the solution i described for threads and GTK was accurately
>described, and works fine, what I wrote about fork(2) is COMPLETELY
>AND UTTERLY INCORRECT. i have been a unix systems programmer for 13
>years, and i have no idea how or why i wrote what i did, but its
>TOTALLY WRONG.
>i apologize for both the misleading information, and for the
>suggestion to the original poster that s/he didn't understand
>fork(2). i am very sorry
I'm the original poster - I read your post in response, and then thought
"What was I thinking? Am I smoking crack?" Then I read back over my
fork() material, and then I didn't understand your post.
No problem. I understand fatigue, since I was in a similar state when I
wrote the post originally. Just so I'm not confused. :)
David Allen
http://opop.nols.com/ Free Software Development
Der Horizont vieler Menschen ist ein Kreis mit Radius Null -- und das
nennen sie ihren Standpunkt.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]