Re: [gtk-list] Re: 1.1 <=> 1.2 not compatible, why not 2.0?
- From: Robert_Gasch/PeopleSoft peoplesoft com
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: 1.1 <=> 1.2 not compatible, why not 2.0?
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 17:10:43 +0100
Not necessarily ... Linux went from 1.0 to 1.1 (dev) to 1.2 (stable) ...
not that that answers your original question, but it at least proves
that the Gtk+ people are not completeley off base with their
versioning scheme ...
Greetings
--> R
Cyrille Artho <cartho@netlink.ch> on 03/25/99 04:55:41 PM
Please respond to gtk-list@redhat.com
To: gtk-list@redhat.com
cc: (bcc: Robert Gasch/PeopleSoft)
Subject: [gtk-list] Re: 1.1 <=> 1.2 not compatible, why not 2.0?
So why is gtk1.2 not gtk2.0? AFAIK you change the major version number
if compatibility is broken.
--
Regards,
Cyrille Artho - http://artho.com/
The human mind treats a new idea the way the body treats a strange
protein -- it rejects it.
-- P. Medawar
--
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]