Re: [gtk-list] Re: More about types...

[Havoc Pennington <rhp zirx pair com>]

On Sat, 6 Mar 1999, Drazen Kacar wrote:
> 
> Neither of them helps a lot, but with printf it would be something
> like this:
>

If you know the answer why did you ask? :-) g_print() would require the
same conditional.
 
> Since GTK has all those gints, gpointers and such, it would be really
> nice if there was gsize_t, goff_t & co. which would eliminate the
> need for #ifdefs and different macros.
>

There's a gsize and gssize (signed and unsigned). I don't think there's an
off_t.
 
> So, is there something like that? If not, which gtype is guaranteed to
> hold size_t and off_t without losing precision?
> 

Nothing special. There's gint/guint/glong/gulong but they don't offer
additional guarantees over int/long.

Havoc