Re: suggestion/request: gtk_init returns on failure
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Jan Kratochvil <short ucw cz>
- Cc: Andy Kahn <kahn zk3 dec com>, gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: suggestion/request: gtk_init returns on failure
- Date: 19 Feb 1999 16:47:50 -0500
Jan Kratochvil <short@ucw.cz> writes:
> > basically, it would be something like this:
> >
> > /*
> > * returns 0 on success, some other value if error
> > */
> > int gtk_init(int *argc, char ***argv);
>
> Maybe it is a hack, but from yet unreleased gBill under development:
[...]
> static void gdk_recovery(void)
> {
> dbg(printf("gdk_recovery!!!\n"));
> if (isinit) {
> dbg(printf("already inited/failed\n"));
> return;
> }
> longjmp(jumpbuffer,1);
> }
The whole point of posting this is to force me to change
GTK+, right? Nobody would actually do such a thing, would
they?
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]