Re: [gtk-list] Re: ?feasibility of numerical lib on the top of glib
- From: Jonathan Mark Brooks <jmbrooks jmbrooks net>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: ?feasibility of numerical lib on the top of glib
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 15:59:24 -0400 (EDT)
Thats the idea behind the STL for C++. Maybe glib can become a standard
container set for C.
On Thu, 29 Apr 1999, Sergei O. Naoumov wrote:
>
> > glib has collection of nicely implemented container objects.
> > What are advantages and disadvantages of assembling numerical
> > library on the top of glib?
>
> The only disadvantage I see is exactly what you stated -- the
> dependence on glib. Some might not like it, saying "well, if I
> want to use your, say, matrix multiplication, I'd have to go
> and install glib." For me, personally, this is not an argument but it
> might be for someone else. I think that there is no need to
> reinvent the wheel, and if there is a good code already that can do
> much of what you need -- use it.
>
> Sergei
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
>
>
****************************************
* J. Mark Brooks, Attorney at Law *
* P.O. Box 39, Randleman, NC 27317 *
* law.office@jmbrooks.net *
* ICQ# 33436248 *
* http://www.jmbrooks.net/law.html *
****************************************
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]