Re: [gtk-list] Re: :gtk design question (events vs signals)
- From: Havoc Pennington <rhp zirx pair com>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: :gtk design question (events vs signals)
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 11:38:14 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Jason Stokes wrote:
>
> >From the viewpoint of the programmer who's thrown control to the standard GTK
> event loop, it looks like this: you've got your GTK machine that drives your
> event-driven application. From time to time some things happen, like a
> toggle-button widget being toggled; these user actions emit signals that you
> associate with callback functions. From time to time, other things happen,
> such as a DestroyEvent; but these things are called "events", not signals,
> even though you handle them much the same way by associating them with
> callback functions, but with a different syntax.
>
Just to add one thing to what Federico said: there is no way to connect
callbacks to events, you can only connect to signals. What syntax do you
mean?
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]