Re: [gtk-list] Re: gdk_io_* clarification
- From: James Macnicol <jamesm evans ee adfa oz au>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: gdk_io_* clarification
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 99 13:07:55 EST
> OK, I'm completely confused.
>
> You surely aren't arguing that:
>
> gdk_input_remove(tag);
> gdk_input_remove(tag);
>
> isn't a bug in your code - it's no different from
>
> free(block);
> free(block);
>
The code is
tag = gdk_input_add_full() (original one in main())
then
gdk_input_remove(tag)
tag = gdk_input_add_full()
gdk_input_remove(tag)
tag = gdk_input_add_full()
There are not two calls to gdk_input_remove() in sucession, just
an add followed immediately by a remove and an add again. I know this seems
a little silly, but from a modularity pont-of-view it'd be nice to have
in my program.
--
James Macnicol
j-macnicol@adfa.edu.au
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]