Re: [gtk-list] gtk-- missing signals



Jan Gentsch <gentsch@ifm.uni-hamburg.de> writes:

> There are a number of signals defined in the gtkeditable class which are
> not reflected in c++ interface.

[...]

> Missing this signals takes away most of the functionalty of the editable
> class. What is the problem with these signals??

They just haven't been implemented yet :-). Gtk-- is lagging a bit
behind gtk+ 1.1.

-- 
					Guillaume.
					http://www.worldnet.fr/~glaurent



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]