No Subject
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel nuclecu unam mx>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 19:27:06 -0600
To: gtk-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: Why is gtk+ written in C?
References: <68D884F3BCA2656F8525669D0002DB8B.000360FE8525669D@avid.com> <3624A6FF.BFCFD67C@avid.com>
From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel@nuclecu.unam.mx>
Date: 29 Oct 1998 19:27:06 -0600
In-Reply-To: Paul Miller's message of Wed, 14 Oct 1998 09:28:31 -0400
Message-ID: <s8zpaeet5h.fsf@bananoid.nuclecu.unam.mx>
Lines: 17
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.2
Another problem with C++-based code is that the language is very big.
This is not inherently a problem, the problem is that different people
choose to use different subsets of the language (the ones they are
confortable with).
In large projects this poses a problem: in the long run you have
code that uses different subsets of the language used randomly in the
project: improving, fixing and redesigning the code tends to require a
person knowledgable in all of the different subsets of the language
used.
This soon becomes a maitainer nightmare.
Miguel.
--
miguel@gnu.org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]