Re: [gtk-list] Re: GTK Installation
- From: Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer cs nmsu edu>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: GTK Installation
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 08:44:21 -0600
Dear Jason
>
> This may sound like a dumb question, but it's legit. Do you have make
> installed AND in your path? Or is the no such file error from make and
> along the lines of there is no makefile?
>
Well, the INSTALL file says that the makefile is called 'make' and that after
you have run ./configure it should be there. However, all I can see are
makefiles that begin with a capital m. So prehaps the makefile has not been
written.
This is all very confusing.
The error response he would get from not having make installed would
be ``make: command not found'' (at least from either bash or tcsh;
I don't know of a shell that's an exception though there may be one).
The gtk+ INSTALL file doesn't say anything about what the makefile is
called (at least it doesn't with 1.1.1; presumably it doesn't in 1.0.6
either).
The makefile created by ./configure is called Makefile.
If you could provide an actual trace of the exact messages you're
given by ./configure and by make, it would be helpful.
--
Joseph J. Pfeiffer, Jr., Ph.D. Phone -- (505) 646-1605
Department of Computer Science FAX -- (505) 646-1002
New Mexico State University http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~pfeiffer
``Welcome to the Hellmouth Petting Zoo'' -- Buffy
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]