Re: [gtk-list] Re: Was : Why is gtk+ written in C? - portability?
- From: Paul Miller <Paul_Miller avid com>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- CC: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: Was : Why is gtk+ written in C? - portability?
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 13:00:06 -0400
> I thought this thread had died, but apparently not...
It turned into a discussion of proper use of ANSI STANDARD "C" versus
using compiler-specific extensions which undermine the portability of
"portable" code. This is VERY important to gtk, and I think it is
important to increase awareness of these issues.
> Can we make it so?
Just because gtk compiles fine with your compiler doesn't mean it's not
a problem.
-Paul
--
Paul T. Miller | paul@elastic.avid.com
Principal Engineer | Opinions expressed here are my own.
Avid Technology, Inc. - Graphics and Effects Software Group
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]