Re: Why is gtk+ written in C?

[Alan Shutko <ats acm org>]

>>>>> "E" == Eric Harlow <linuxgeek@yahoo.com> writes:

E> Isn't C++ portable? 

Not really.  Not yet, at least.  It was just standardized within the
last few months, and compilers have varying degrees of compliance.
And at that, it's an improvement... it used to be _really_ unportable.

-- 
Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org> - By consent of the corrupted
I haven't lost my mind -- it's backed up on tape somewhere.