Re: g_list_insert_sorted bug
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor gtk org>
- To: Patrick Rogan <rogan lycos com>
- Cc: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: g_list_insert_sorted bug
- Date: 01 Jul 1998 21:39:34 -0400
Patrick Rogan <rogan@lycos.com> writes:
> Sorry Owen, you are incorrect.
Well, it wouldn't be the first time. (One only learns by being
wrong occasionally...) But, in this case I'm pretty sure
of myself. ;-)
[...]
> int some_func(gpointer data, gpointer user_data) {
> printf ("*: %s, %s\n", data, user_data);
> }
>
> int main (){
> GSList *Llist;
>
> Llist = g_slist_alloc();
Here is your problem. g_slist_alloc() does not allocate
a singly-linked-list, it allocates one node of a singly
linked note. [ And one very seldom has to call that function
directly, since nodes are usually allocated by g_slist_prepend()
or g_slist_append() ]
As in my example last time, the correct way to allocate
an empty GSlist is.
GSList *Llist;
llist = NULL;
Yep, a empty GSList is just a NULL pointer. (There are no
nodes, so nothing to point to.)
Hope this clears things up,
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]