Re: [gtk-list] Re: egcs warning

[Scott Stone <sstone turbolinux com>]

On 1 Dec 1998, Alan Shutko wrote:

> >>>>> "S" == Scott Stone <sstone@turbolinux.com> writes:
> S> heh, well, egcs does a lot of things better than gcc, as well.  And
> S> I believe -O6 is even more dangerous on the old gcc than it is with
> S> egcs..
> 
> Actually, I think it's perfectly safe, since it doesn't exist.  (It
> won't complain, but it won't complain about -O99999 either.)  As I
> recall, only up to -O3 exists on gcc.

Hm, it must map -O{ > 3} to -O3, then.  I think egcs might do the same
thing - however, I do know that -O2 is safe, so ...?  When the next egcs
comes out, I'll try it with that as well.

I've had some other apps have trouble with -O6 as well, so I'm just going
to stick with -O2 for now.  That should be optimized enough, i hope :)

> 
> -- 
> Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org> - By consent of the corrupted
> An engineer is someone who does list processing in FORTRAN.
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
> 

--------------------------------------------------
Scott M. Stone <sstone@pht.com, sstone@pht.co.jp>
Head of TurboLinux Development/Systems Administrator
Pacific HiTech, Inc (USA) / Pacific HiTech, KK (Japan)