Re: Possible bug: gtk_tree_item_remove_subtree()
- From: <adustman comstar net>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Possible bug: gtk_tree_item_remove_subtree()
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 16:41:41 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 20 Apr 1998 adustman@comstar.net wrote:
> A quick inspection of gtktreeitem.c:1010-1016 reveals:
>
> if (item->pixmaps_box)
> {
> gtk_container_remove (GTK_CONTAINER (item->pixmaps_box),
> item->minus_pix_widget);
> gtk_container_add (GTK_CONTAINER (item->pixmaps_box),
> item->plus_pix_widget);
> }
A similar code fragment is in gtk_real_tree_item_collapse() (910-916):
if (tree_item->pixmaps_box)
{
gtk_container_remove (GTK_CONTAINER (tree_item->pixmaps_box),
tree_item->minus_pix_widget);
gtk_container_add (GTK_CONTAINER (tree_item->pixmaps_box),
tree_item->plus_pix_widget);
}
Since the collapse occurs before remove_subtree would be called, this
would indeed seem to be a bug and explains the error messages: It can't
remove the mius_pix_widget because is is not a child of the pixmaps_box,
and it can't add plus_pix_widget to pixmaps_box because it is already a
child of pixmaps_box. So it would seem that the solution is to either a)
remove lines 1010-1016 or b) change the gtk_container_remove to remove the
child of item->pixmaps_box (i.e. don't specify a specific object, use
gtk_container_children()). I lean towards a), but there may be other
reasons to do b).
--
Andy Dustman Charles Babbage:
ComStar Communications Corp. He never used Linux,
(770) 333-8779 | PGP KeyID=0xC72F3F1D and now, he's dead.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]