Re: show order difference between 0.99.9 and 0.99.10?
- From: Dave Reed <dreed capital edu>
- To: owt1 cornell edu
- Cc: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: show order difference between 0.99.9 and 0.99.10?
- Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1998 13:38:30 -0400
> Dave Reed <dreed@capital.edu> writes:
>
> > In 0.99.9, I had something like:
> >
> > gtk_widget_show(verticalBox_);
> > gtk_widget_show(menubar_);
> > gtk_widget_show(baseWidget_);
> >
> > where verticalBox_ and menubar_ are inside the baseWidget_
> > (baseWidget_ was a window containing them). It worked fine.
> >
> > With 0.99.10 this segfaults, but changing it to the following seems to
> > work:
> >
> > gtk_widget_show(baseWidget_);
> > gtk_widget_show(verticalBox_);
> > gtk_widget_show(menubar_);
> >
> >
> > Which of the following three is true? :-)
> >
> > a. this is normal and is a result of some of the changes from 0.9 to
> > 0.10
> >
> > b. this indicates there is some other bug in my code
> >
> > c. this indicates a bug in gtk
>
> Most likely c. Could you provide a short example that demonstrates the
> behavior? [ If that isn't possible, a stack trace of where it
> segfaults and any messages that were printed out before hand would be
> useful ] The order of showing things should make no difference.
>
> Regards,
> Owen
I couldn't reproduce it with a real simple program. I have built a
very small layer on top of gtk so I'd have to send you that also to
try it (and will if a strack trace doesn't allow you to track down the
problem). I'm at work right now using Solaris and strace is set so that
only root can execute it. I will try it at home tonight on my Linux
machine and let you know what happens there.
Dave
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]