Re: [gtk-list] Re: Perl comments

[Kenneth Albanowski <kjahds kjahds com>]

On 24 Oct 1997, Marius Vollmer wrote:

> gtk_signal_set_funcs should be removed, I think.  Use
> gtk_signal_connect_interp instead.

Oops, I didn't even notice g_s_connect_interp was there. Yes, that should
simplify matters. 

> > Also, init callbacks aren't processed through the marshaller yet. Just
> > about everything else is, though.
> 
> What are they used for, anyway?

Functions that are to be called automatically, in order, when gtk_main() 
is invoked. I've no idea what the specific reason for them is. 

> Yes.  It would certainly complicate the handling of the type system,
> but that's unavoidable.  There aren't many spots in Gtk where this
> would matter, I think.

Yes, I think the macros separate everything out acceptably.

-- 
Kenneth Albanowski (kjahds@kjahds.com, CIS: 70705,126)