Re: That darn "Reply-To"

["Michael K. Johnson" <johnsonm redhat com>]

Owen Taylor writes:
>Could wthe Reply-To header be removed from gtk-list?

No.

HOWEVER, please recall what has been stated before: messages sent to
the list with a "reply-to:" header do NOT have that header replaced.
People who send messages which should be replied to privately should
insert reply-to headers.  Those who want the messages to be replied
to normally (the default) should not include reply-to messages.

>The "general consensus" seems to be is that this is broken behavior.

Uh, I'm not convinced.

michaelkjohnson

"Magazines all too frequently lead to books and should be regarded by the
 prudent as the heavy petting of literature."            -- Fran Lebowitz