Re: [gtk-list] Re: Why g_print ?
- From: Werner Koch <wk isil d shuttle de>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: Why g_print ?
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 11:18:46 +0200
On Thu, Jul 31, 1997 at 04:38:13AM +0200, Tim Janik wrote:
> regarding g_malloc(), g_free() and siblings, these functions are much safer
> than thier libc equivalences. e.g. g_free() just returns if called with
> NULL, i even rely on that behaviour in my apps.
^^^^^
That's required by Standard C, see also free(3).
Werner
--
Werner Koch, Duesseldorf - werner.koch@guug.de - PGP keyID: 0C9857A5
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]