Re: Font priorities

From: Damon Chaplin <damon karuna uklinux net>
To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
Cc: GTK-I18N Mailing List <gtk-i18n-list gnome org>
Subject: Re: Font priorities
Date: 15 Feb 2003 01:01:49 +0000

On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 02:19, Owen Taylor wrote: 

> The Tibetan glyphs are worse ... they are just done by transcribing
> the pictures from the Unicode book, dotted circles and all.

I noticed some GPL'ed Tibetan fonts available from the Tibetan &
Himalayan Digital Library: 

   http://iris.lib.virginia.edu/tibet/tools/fonts.html

They are supposed to be very good quality, but the encodings used seem a
bit weird. Anyway, maybe they are useful.

Damon

References:
- Re: Font priorities
  - From: Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: Font priorities
  - From: Owen Taylor

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]