Re: Another --> Re: GtkMovementStep of GtkTextView
- From: Mark Leisher <mleisher crl nmsu edu>
- To: gtk-i18n-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Another --> Re: GtkMovementStep of GtkTextView
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 15:16:05 -0600 (MDT)
Chookij> I'm just realizing that lam+alif case, the cursor can be in
Chookij> between. This is different than the hindi ligature which cursors
Chookij> couldn't be placed in the middle. If this isn't correct, anyone
Chookij> please clearify ?
This is true. Cursors do not show up well in Indic aksharas because of things
like half forms, subjoined consonants, and non-spacing vowels (plus RA).
There are ways to simulate cursor motion through an akshara (cluster).
Underlining the separate pieces, for instance, as the cursor key is pressed,
leaving the I-beam cursor in one place.
Chookij> Just want to make sure that I understand the point, in Pango
Chookij> technology, we are trying to sepearate between the "display"
Chookij> algorithm and "cursor movement" algorithm. So, in this lam+alif
Chookij> case, the cursor can be moved/placed in between lam and alif but
Chookij> it's not because of 2 characters forms one cluster and they
Chookij> aren't one single grapheme. It shouldn't be matter because the
Chookij> display algorithm and cursor movement algorithm are
Chookij> seperate. Right ?
Correct. When moving forward, the internal cursor moves over the LAM and ALIF
characters while the external cursor moves over the single ligature (grapheme)
of LAM-ALIF.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Leisher Times are bad. Children no longer obey
Computing Research Lab their parents, and everyone is writing
New Mexico State University a book.
Box 30001, Dept. 3CRL -- Marcus Tullius Cicero
Las Cruces, NM 88003
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]