Re: Concerning the hyphen confusion in BiDi (was: Re: Bidirectional Bugs in Hebrew)
- From: Omer Zak <omerz actcom co il>
- To: Ivrix Discussions <ivrix-discuss ivrix org il>
- Cc: gtk-i18n-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Concerning the hyphen confusion in BiDi (was: Re: Bidirectional Bugs in Hebrew)
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 07:21:36 +0200 (IST)
Just for reference, the Unicode 3.0 standard defines the following
characters:
Mixed hyphen+math:
------------------
U+002D - hyphen-minus (the character which is causing all those troubles
in Hebrew BiDi text processing)
Hyphen only:
------------
U+2010 - hyphen
U+2011 - nonbreaking hyphen
U+2012 - figure dash
U+2013 - en dash
U+2014 - em dash
Math only:
----------
U+2212 - minus sign (as math operation)
--- Omer
WARNING TO SPAMMERS: see at http://www.zak.co.il/spamwarning.html
On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
>
> > I don't think there is such a thing as "hebrew hyphen" (nor even "RTL hyphen")
> > But, on the other hand, there is "minus/dash" and "soft-hyphen" (and also
> > typographic "en dash" and "em dash"); only the "minus/dash" is a problem,
> > as it is not a neutral character like the others but is considered to have
> > the same properties as numbers (and possibly other mathematical symbols).
>
> Hi
>
> just one note:
>
> in the previous thread in ivrix-discuss it was mentioned that soft-hyphen
> won't do the job:
> http://ivrix.org.il/mailing-lists/ivrix-discuss/2000/10/0052.html
>
> IIRC unicode does have a seperate hyphen character. Any idea if most
> unicode fonts contain it?
>
> --
> Tzafrir Cohen
> mailto:tzafrir technion ac il
> http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]