Re: Unicode and C++
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: gtk-i18n-list redhat com
- Cc: libstdc++ sourceware cygnus com
- Subject: Re: Unicode and C++
- Date: 05 Jul 2000 13:02:28 -0400
Nathan Myers <ncm@nospam.cantrip.org> writes:
> > Also you can use ASCII string literals with UTF8, which means you can
> > usually use string literals (most apps use English for their gettext
> > keys). People simply won't accept not being able to use string
> > literals.
>
> There is no problem with wide character string literals in C or C++,
> and hasn't been for a very long time. Simply prefix with a letter 'L'.
>
> wchar_t hello = L"hello, world";
Perhaps it wouldn't be if there was agreement on:
- The encoding for source code files. (It certainly shouldn't
be dependent on the user's locale.)
- The width of wchar_t
- The encoding of wchar_t
The C standard makes no guarantees about any of these, and
my copy of GCC (CVS snapshot from a few weeks ago, I think)
certainly doesn't do what I would consider the right thing.
L"utf8-text"
Gives you a string where each 4-byte wide character contains
one byte of the UTF-8 string. Maybe I'm missing something,
but relying on the L"" to do _anything_ predictable in
a portable program seems like a very poor idea.
Regards,
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]