Re: more tree information
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Matthias Clasen <maclas gmx de>
- Cc: gtk-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: more tree information
- Date: 23 Jun 2003 18:02:09 -0400
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 17:44, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I think it would be nice if gtk-doc showed the known derived interfaces
> of an interface and the known subclasses of a class.
>
> A patch for this is attached to
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115528
>
> If nobody objects, I'd like to commit this.
Seems reasonable to me, though I bet we'll get various
complaints about subclasses that weren't known about.
> PS Speaking about patches, there is another old gtk-doc patch of mine
> rotting in bugzilla (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61345)
> which makes the (), # abbreviations emit proper
> DocBook markup for non-crossreferenced functions and symbols, so
> that eg occurrences of strlen() in inline docs will come out as
> <tt>strlen()</tt> in html. Are there any reasons to not commit that
> patch ?
Idea sounds right. I added a couple of comments to the bug
report.
Regards,
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]