Re: 1e+02% function docs coverage

["Matthias Clasen" <matthiasc poet de>]

Fine with me.

What I would like to see eventually is broken down completeness statistics
not
only for functions/macros, but also for the other kinds of symbols gtk-doc
cares about.
If that is too much work, I would tend to think that the global completeness
count
should not only look at functions and macros,  but at all symbols.
Otherwise, the
100% give a wrong signal.

Matthias

----- Original Message -----
From: "Damon Chaplin" <damon ximian com>
To: "Matthias Clasen" <matthiasc poet de>
Cc: <gtk-doc-list gnome org>
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 1:04 AM
Subject: Re: 1e+02% function docs coverage


> On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 02:48, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > Damon,
> >
> > thanks for committing my patch. Unfortunately, the script which produces
> > http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/status.shtml
> > from the MODULE-undocumented.txt files seems to rely on the format
> > being %.0f. At least the numbers which are shown there now look
suspiciously
> > like the fractional part of the real percentage...
>
> Yes, I was a bit worried about that.
>
> I'll switch both to %.0f instead. OK?
>
> Damon
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-doc-list mailing list
> gtk-doc-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-doc-list