Re: using literal zero for NULL

[Enrico Weigelt <weigelt metux de>]

* Jon A. Cruz <jon joncruz org> schrieb:

> >I've never worked out why anybody needs to type "0" when they could  
> >type
> >"NULL". Given all the random segfaults, and type errors, and  
> >readability
> >concerns and whatnot, are your fingers _really_ that lazy?
> 
> Some of it is more of a C++ thing, rather than pure C. And there was,  
> at least for a while, a period where using 0 for C++ solved a lot  
> more problems.

In other words: people used broken C++ compilers ?


cu
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt    ==   metux IT service

  phone:     +49 36207 519931         www:       http://www.metux.de/
  fax:       +49 36207 519932         email:     contact metux de
  cellphone: +49 174 7066481
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 -- DSL ab 0 Euro. -- statische IP -- UUCP -- Hosting -- Webshops --
---------------------------------------------------------------------