Re: Sinkability: usefull in language bindings ? [was: Re: Sinkability considered harmful]
- From: muppet <scott asofyet org>
- To: GTK+ development mailing list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Sinkability: usefull in language bindings ? [was: Re: Sinkability considered harmful]
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 01:03:21 -0500
On Jan 4, 2006, at 11:51 PM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Excuse me but I still dont register, why can you assume that
a function returning a GtkObject cant return an added reference ?
Such special cases such as that are handled as special cases. I can
recall implementing a few, but can't recall which ones off the top of
my head.
Long story short, lest it get lost:
- there is truth to the assertion that floating can aid language
bindings.
- nevertheless, i dislike the inconsistency of semantics and would
rather not have it.
--
I think it worked on the Wiley Coyote model of project management - if
at any point you looked down and realised what you were doing was
impossible then you'd instantly fail.
-- Simon Wistow
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]