Re: Gtk+ Recent files updates
- From: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com>
- To: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- Cc: GTK Devel List <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Gtk+ Recent files updates
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:28:39 +0200
Hi Murray,
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 21:01 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> The GtkRecentFilterInfo struct should be registered as a boxed type,
> ideally with a copy function, so it can be used more easily by language
> bindings.
The GtkRecentFilterInfo structure is similar to GtkFileFilterInfo, which
is not a boxed type either. Do you want both to become boxed types?
It's a real question - not a rhetorical one: making GtkRecentFilterInfo
a boxed type makes a compelling motive for GtkFileFilterInfo to become a
boxed type too[1]; we would be braking ABI, though. On the other hand,
the same code bindings are using to convert a GtkFileFilterInfo to
whatever native type they are using could be easily replicated for
GtkRecentFilterInfo.
+++
[1] For the Perl bindings, the GtkFileFilterInfo is automagically
converted to an HASH object, but the conversion code is not
auto-generated, so it might make sense to use a boxed type.
Ciao,
Emmanuele.
--
Emmanuele Bassi - <ebassi gmail com>
Log: http://log.emmanuelebassi.net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]