option_name in NO_ARG(goption)
- From: Masatake YAMATO <jet gyve org>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: option_name in NO_ARG(goption)
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:31:16 +0900 (JST)
Hi,
Is there any strong reason to pass NULL as option_name to
a callback function of goption when G_OPTION_FLAG_NO_ARG is
set to flag?
Even if arg_data can be passed when registering a callback
function, option_name is useful for the callback function
which handles multiple options.
2005-06-21 Masatake YAMATO <jet gyve org>
* glib/goption.c (parse_short_option): Passing
option_name even if NO_ARG it TRUE.
(parse_long_option): Ditto.
Index: glib/goption.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/glib/glib/goption.c,v
retrieving revision 1.41
diff -u -r1.41 goption.c
--- glib/goption.c 18 Jun 2005 04:55:25 -0000 1.41
+++ glib/goption.c 21 Jun 2005 08:34:47 -0000
@@ -904,8 +904,13 @@
{
if (NO_ARG (&group->entries[j]))
{
+ gchar *option_name;
+
+ option_name = g_strdup_printf ("-%c", group->entries[j].short_name);
parse_arg (context, group, &group->entries[j],
- NULL, NULL, error);
+ NULL, option_name, error);
+ g_free (option_name);
+
*parsed = TRUE;
}
else
@@ -972,8 +977,12 @@
if (NO_ARG (&group->entries[j]) &&
strcmp (arg, group->entries[j].long_name) == 0)
{
+ gchar *option_name;
+
+ option_name = g_strconcat ("--", group->entries[j].long_name, NULL);
parse_arg (context, group, &group->entries[j],
- NULL, NULL, error);
+ NULL, option_name, error);
+ g_free(option_name);
add_pending_null (context, &((*argv)[*index]), NULL);
*parsed = TRUE;
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]