Re: gobject thread safety

On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 12:02 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Tim, congratulations to the new job. 
> Does that mean you get paid now to review gobject patches ? 
> That would be awesome :-)
> I'd like to make one last attempt to get some motion on the 
> gobject thread safety bugs,
> Can you remind me what you think is wrong with the patch
> for 65041 ? It does not introduce new api and simply uses
> GOnce for the get_type functions inside gobject. I have 
> attached it below. Also, if you could elaborate a little
> more on why you think the patch for 64764 is "a joke",
> that might help to move things forward... 

It would also be extremely sweet to get the atomic refcount patches in:

Whomever this is blocking on, please please try to move it forward.

 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
                   alexl redhat com    alla lysator liu se 
He's an otherworldly Amish farmboy looking for a cure to the poison coursing 
through his veins. She's a blind out-of-work bodyguard with her own daytime 
radio talk show. They fight crime! 

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]