Re: glib and pango 2.10 in GNOME 2.14?

[Matthias Clasen <mclasen redhat com>]

On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 13:11 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> On Thu, December 1, 2005 13:10, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > [I'm not sure why I didn't cc gtk-devel-list in my previous mail, so
> > doing it right now]
> 
> And really doing it now.
> 
> > On Thu, December 1, 2005 13:01, Murray Cumming wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 12:58 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> >>> On Thu, December 1, 2005 11:05, Murray Cumming wrote:
> >>> > Can the release-team please confirm the glib and pango versions that
> >>> will
> >>> > be in GNOME 2.14? It looks like there will be a glib 2.10 and pango
> >>> 2.10
> >>> > in time for our schedule, but not a GTK+ 2.10.
> >>>
> >>> If the schedule of glib 2.10 and pango 1.12 (I think this is the
> >>> version
> >>> you're wondering about) is compatible with ours, then I see no reason
> >>> to not use them.
> >>>
> >>> I can't find a release schedule for glib & pango, though (although
> >>> Matthias sent a mail on d-d-l telling he wanted this to happen,
> >>> iirc).
> >>
> >> We need to establish this to
> >> - avoid use of new API if we might not use them.
> >> - tell bindings to wrap them if we definitely will use them.
> >
> > Indeed. I don't think a lot of people are using glib 2.9 or pango 1.11
> > right now (so I don't expect the first item to be a problem right now),
> > but the second item is important.
> >
> > glib/pango people: do you have an idea of the release date for glib
> > 2.10.0 and pango 1.12.0?
> >
> >

When we discussed the shortened schedules at the last GTK+ team meeting,
I proposed to aim for API freeze for GLib 2.10 and Pango 1.12 before or
immediately after the Christmas break, so that we can do API frozen
releases in the first week of January. 

Matthias