Re: "changed" and GtkEntry set_text
- From: Soeren Sandmann <sandmann daimi au dk>
- To: Christian Robottom Reis <kiko async com br>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: "changed" and GtkEntry set_text
- Date: 20 Jun 2004 17:04:10 +0200
Christian Robottom Reis <kiko async com br> writes:
> In 1.2 two "changed" events were emitted. Owen has said that
>
> In general, "changed" signals should be thought of as
> "something might have changed" rather than as "something
> changed".
>
> However I'm unsure how to interpret that in this specific case. Should I
> rely on this staying this way, or was it an `accidental' change?
It's a deliberate change. In general, gtk+ tries not to emit change
notifications when nothing actually changes. What Owen said should be
interpreted as "there is no *guarantee* that something actually
changed", ie. you _might_ get a changed signal even if nothing
changed.
Søren
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]