Re: GTK+-2.3.4 released [unstable]

[Matthias Clasen <maclas gmx de>]

Am Mi, den 25.02.2004 schrieb Tomasz Kłoczko um 17:44:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Owen Taylor wrote:
> [..]
> > Looks like we're missing a requirement on glib-2.3.3, upgrade and make
> > sure GTK+ is finding it and you should be fine. (G_DEFINE_TYPE changed
> > slightly between 2.3.2 and 2.3.3)
> 
> Yes. This was compiled on glib 2.3.2.
> Why (the hel) gtk+ autoconf script have incorrect checking enviromet ? ;)
> 
> <disclaimer>I have RW access</dislaimer>
> Is it not will be good commit to gtk+ ?
> 
> Index: configure.in
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gnome/gtk+/configure.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.361
> diff -u -r1.361 configure.in
> --- configure.in        25 Feb 2004 00:43:21 -0000      1.361
> +++ configure.in        25 Feb 2004 16:33:40 -0000
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
>  m4_define([gtk_binary_version], [2.2.0])
>  
>  # required versions of other packages
> -m4_define([glib_required_version], [2.3.2])
> +m4_define([glib_required_version], [2.3.3])
>  m4_define([pango_required_version], [1.2.0])
>  m4_define([atk_required_version], [1.0.1])
> 
> or even better (because this is not first time)
> 
> Index: configure.in
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gnome/gtk+/configure.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.361
> diff -u -r1.361 configure.in
> --- configure.in        25 Feb 2004 00:43:21 -0000      1.361
> +++ configure.in        25 Feb 2004 16:35:54 -0000
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
>  m4_define([gtk_binary_version], [2.2.0])
>  
>  # required versions of other packages
> -m4_define([glib_required_version], [2.3.2])
> +m4_define([glib_required_version],[$gtk_major_version.$gtk_minor_version.$gtk_micro_version])
>  m4_define([pango_required_version], [1.2.0])
>  m4_define([atk_required_version], [1.0.1])

No, think about the current situation: gtk+ 2.3.4, glib 2.3.3