Re: gdk_draw_segments crash the application when called with more than 32767 segments.
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: David Odin <David dindinx org>
- Cc: Matthias Clasen <maclas gmx de>, jwillcox gnome org, gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gdk_draw_segments crash the application when called with more than 32767 segments.
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:38:47 -0500
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 04:39, David Odin wrote:
> > > > - What's the interaction of this with maximum request sizes? Is
> > > > 32767 really the right figure here or just an approximation
> > > > that works on your system?
> > > >
> > > The error message I got told me this should be a 16 bits value...
> >
> > Having only 16 bits to store the length is one thing (which gives you an
> > upper bound of
> > 32767), but the X protocol also has a maximal request size, which can vary
> > from server to server. So even if the X protocol may allow an XDrawSegments
> > request with 32767 segments, it may be too large for the server you're talking
> > with.
> >
> An old documentation I have here, about X11R4, says that we should use
> the value returned by XMaxRequestSize minus 3 divided by 2. This really
> looks like black magic to me, but this wouldn't be hard to implement.
If you look in the X protocol docs, then you'll see where it comes
from, but actually, you'll find in the docs for XMaxRequestSize:
Xlib automatically breaks data
up into multiple protocol requests as necessary for the following
func-
tions: XDrawPoints, XDrawRectangles, XDrawSegments, XFillArcs,
XFill-
Rectangles, and XPutImage.
So, research determines that this isn't an issue. On the other hand,
I see no evidence supporting a value of 32767... can you explain
why you think this is a relevant value?
> Can we move this discussion to bugzilla, so the comments won't be
> forgotten?
I put a link in bugzilla to this thread earlier.
Regards,
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]