Re: Some 2.6 thinking
- From: todd <taf2 lehigh edu>
- To: Gaël Le Mignot <kilobug freesurf fr>
- Cc: Damon Chaplin <damon karuna uklinux net>, Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Some 2.6 thinking
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:00:03 -0400
Gaël Le Mignot wrote:
Hello Damon!
13 Apr 2004 11:14:06 +0100, you wrote:
> Has there been any discussion on what people see as the biggest gaps in
> GTK+? A lot of the items in the list might be nice, but aren't too
> important.
What I would personnally like is a way to include more widgets as
GtkCellRenders, either a way to put generic widgets, or at least a way
to add most basic widgets (combo, spin, buttons, and even progress
bars and such). That's the only weakness I see in the great
TreeView/TreeModel API.
Anyway, congratulations for the great job you all did on Gtk+ ! :)
I think most of this work has already been done it's just a matter of
finding the work and organaizing it. For, instance
Tim's tutorial providers pointers to (Progressbar, Combo, Date)
CellRenderers,
http://scentric.net/tutorial/sec-custom-cell-renderers-external.html
and Lorenzo's GtkGrid provides a spin button cellrenderer,
http://www.sicem.biz/personal/lgs/projects/gtkgrid/view_project.
I'm sure there are more out there... But i agree it would be helpful if
the gtk+ library included these cellrenderers, if for no better reason
than that it would make them more accessible to developers.
-todd
begin:vcard
fn:Todd Fisher
n:Fisher;Todd
email;internet:taf2 lehigh edu
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://severna.homeip.net
version:2.1
end:vcard
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]