On 2003-09-29 01:51 +0200, Matthias Clasen <maclas gmx de> wrote: > It occurred to me that submenus pose similar problems to separators in > connection with merging: you don't know in advance whether they will end > up with visible children after merging. For those submenus which end up > empty, there are two reasonable behaviours: > > a) make them disappear by hiding the menu item they're attached to > b) add an insensitive "Empty" item. Instead of the "Empty" item, wouldn't it be better to have the menu itself insensitive? That way it should be obvious beforehand the menu is empty, you'd save the extra roundtrip otherwise needed for peeking inside the submenu to see if it really is empty or not. Just a thought. -- Tommi Komulainen tommi komulainen iki fi GPG 1024D/68388EE6 6FD6 DD79 EB38 BF6F 3533 09C0 04A8 9871 6838 8EE6
Attachment:
pgpyTnKGm3zSt.pgp
Description: PGP signature