Re: reparenting toplevel windows crash

Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> writes:

> Hmm, 116719 is a bit of a mess ... the initial bug and the first
> duplicate are almost certainly a dups of 105745, but the last
> two bug you dup'ed certainly look to plausibly be this problem.

Yeah, you are right, I must have been confused by the stack-traces
looking similar. I have duplicated the two bugs against 117579 now,
and duplicated 116719 against 105745


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]