Re: GTK+-2.x planning

Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik sun com> writes:

> On 13 Mar 2002, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > 
> > Calum Benson <calum benson sun com> writes: 
> > > Neither works in our latest overnight build here (pulled from head at
> > > about 5am GMT this morning)... hope it hasn't gone the same way as the
> > > b0rked menu accelerators in gtk-2.0.0  :/

All accelerators should be considered broken on Solaris until they are
fixed... there is something global going wrong, not dozens of different
individual bugs.

> > Buy us a Solaris machine to test on. ;-)
> >  
> Iso images of Solaris/x86 aren't downloadable any more? I'm sure
> organizing a copule of cd-s to show up will be far easier than buying a
> machine... 8-)

Yeah, but then we'd end up with a machine running Solaris/x86 that could
be running a perfectly good operating system ;-)

Despite Havoc's offer, the best situation is, of course, if people are
testing and debugging on the platforms they care about.
> On a more serious note, it would probably be far easier to just figure out
> which version of Xfree86 with which modules (not) loaded would roughly
> correspond to the X that came with Solaris 8 FCS.

Before 2.0.0, I tested extensively with XFree86 with XKEYBOARD turned off
and it worked perfectly. Something is different about Solaris.. hopefully
Padraig's investigations on bug 75412 will turn up what that is.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]