Re: GTK+ translation status

["R.I.P. Deaddog" <maddog linuxhall org>]

On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Tor Lillqvist wrote:

> Dennis Bjorklund writes:
> > In the past fuzzy translation was not included in the end result 
> 
> Aargh, you are correct, of course. Sorry. 
> 
> Hmm, but it's only GNU msgfmt that recognizes the fuzzy
> pseudo-comment. The Solaris msgfmt, for instance, gladly includes the
> fuzzy translations in the .mo file. We don't require GNU gettext, or
> do we?

If I'm not mistaken, then it's true that GNU gettext is needed,
and newer version is needed too (e.g. GNU gettext 0.10.35 would
be BAD).

Abel