Re: 64-bit analysis of the gtk+ library

[James Henstridge <james daa com au>]

Shivram U wrote:

> 4. Warnings due to VisualIDs being treated as 32-bit quantities.
> 	Would VisualIDs exceed the max value of 2x32-1 (can we have so many
> VisualIDs :-) ). If so then they may have to be fixed.
>
> 5. Warnings due to XIDs being treated as 32-bit quantities.
> 	Would these warnings have to be fixed ?
>
> 6. Warnings due to Atom values being treated as 32-bit quantities.
> 	Would these warnings have to be fixed.
These are treated as 32 bit quantities by the X protocol.  IIRC, it is 
just the Xlib library that returns these IDs as longs.

> 7. Warnings due to pixel values being treated as 32-bit quantities.
> 	I guess these can be safely ignored.
>
>  
I have no idea about this one.

James.

--
Email: james daa com au              | Linux.conf.au 2003 Call for Papers out
WWW:   http://www.daa.com.au/~james/ |   http://conf.linux.org.au/cfp.html