Re: Some initial thoughts about 2.4
- From: Biswapesh Chattopadhyay <biswapesh_chatterjee tcscal co in>
- To: GTK Devel <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Cc: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Some initial thoughts about 2.4
- Date: 30 Dec 2002 10:28:28 +0530
<snip>
> Possible features: [off the top of my head]
>
> - File selector (we have to get this one)
> - Combo widget (Kris has made progress here)
> - New action-based menu API (based on James Henstridge's work, most
> likely)
> - Toolbar improvements
> - GObject private data
> - Full Unicode 3.2 (4.0?) support, including non-BMP portions.
> - GtkModelFilter (Pretty much done in libegg)
> - Make RTL text editing really work (automatic paragraph
> direction, etc.)
> - Height-for-width geometry management. (Define a new interface,
> support it GtkVBox, GtkLabel woudl be the minimum.)
>
How about performance and footprint improvement ?
GTK2 seems substantially slower and heavier than GTK1 on my machine.
This is obviously not a settings problem since quite a few others have
been saying the same thing on gnomedesktop.org and other places.
It is difficult to 'quantify' the slowness, but I'll try to point out
some specifics:
o Startup times seem to have increased.
o Menus, etc. are not as responsive as 1.x.
o Seems more memory hungry.
o Scrolling seems slower.
o Redraws seem slower.
o Tree/ListView and TextView are significantly heavier and slower than
the old CList and plain text widgets.
o This is rather vague, but it doesn't doesn't 'feel' fast.
These observations are based on GNOME2 CVS head, the gtk-demo program,
Mozilla and Scintilla (identical code compiled against GTK1 and GTK2).
Specifically:
o I have tried FOX, GTK1, QT, Windows and GTK2 versions of Scintilla
and the GTK2 version feels the slowest by far.
o CVS Mozilla is slower when compiled against GTK2.
o WxWindows apps (I couldn't get the whole thing to compile/work
unfortunately) feel significantly slower and heavier when WX is compiled
against GTK2 vs. the GTK1 and pure X versions.
Currently, I would go as far as to say that GTK2 is the slowest toolkit
on X (after comparing FOX, QT 3.1.1, GTK1.2.10, GTK2 CVS, OpenMotif
2.2). Even AWT seems faster once loaded. The only toolkits slower than
GTK2 currently is Swing IMO.
I am using RH73+, XFree86 CVS and GTK2 CVS. Sun JDK 1.4.1.
Hope this helps.
Thanks and regards,
Biswa.
> I want to keep a HTML plan on www.gtk.org with tentative schedules,
> notes about major items, etc. (gtk-web module is autoupdate,
> so anyone with CVS access can update.)
>
> I think most of the major features proposals have already had some
> writeup, so the main thing that needs doing is collecting the
> bugzilla and mail archive links.
>
> Regards,
> Owen
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
>
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]