Re: GTK+-2.2.0 Final plans

[Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>]

On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Havoc Pennington wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 10:59:52PM -0500, Luis Villa wrote: 
> > Well, sheeeeet. I can do that with my eyes closed. ;) And if the focus
> > is kept on user impact, I'd trust any of several volunteers to do it on
> > Thursday as well. Should they be set on the gtk 2.2 milestone as well?
> 
> Yes, I would say anything High should go on 2.2.0, and anything that
> doesn't have significant user impact should be moved to 2.4.0 (or if
> it has or should have the API keyword to "2.4.0 API freeze"). Ideally
> just 4-5 high priority issues are left on 2.2.0, as very little time
> is left.
> 

Is 'non-critical bugfixes only go into gtk+ head' a general gtk+ patch
policy ?

> If somebody has time to do this, many thanks in advance.
> 
> Havoc
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
> 

	Sander

	There are voices in the street,
	And the sound of running feet,
	And they whisper the word --
	Revolution!