G_HAVE_GROWING_STACK #define
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: timj gtk org
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: G_HAVE_GROWING_STACK #define
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 16:38:17 -0400 (EDT)
Hmm:
case x$g_stack_grows in
xyes) echo "#define G_HAVE_GROWING_STACK 1" >>$outfile ;;
*) echo "#define G_HAVE_GROWING_STACK 0" >>$outfile ;;
esac
Isn't the '#define G_HAVE_GROWING_STACK 0' a bug? We don't
do that for any other HAVE define, and it means that:
#ifdef G_HAVE_GROWING_STACK
Works wrong. Of course, gsignal.c itself does:
return G_HAVE_GROWING_STACK ? MAX (c, s) : MIN (c, s);
So maybe it would be a bad idea to change this now :-(.
Regards,
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]